Option A A player who's a cricsim legend, (at the sim), someone who's dominant, like a Gemmell with the bat, or a Bullpitt/Wilson with the ball, but, who is inactive, and may drop in the odd post, but, like 2-3 a year, that kind of a thing, really not around much to contribute to the club, only on the field. Option B Someone who for some reason or another hasn't played much cricket, or just weirdly failed at the sim, like a Damo, or someone who's not all too great, but there's potential (like Mousey) but adds heaps to the forum, really gun poster, great in the subforum, and not a douchebag (by all reports, like a Mousey or a Heef). Essentially an allround top bloke, but, not all too great on the sim. ---------- Essentially it's whether you value a good team environment or a good team.
Can someone who has power add a poll in, says cannot support mode of compression for me. I'd choose option B tbh
Obviously both is ideal, but if it was either or. Also, what if they were just fail at the sim, no hope.
The Vipers would probably take Option A in terms of the team. We already have a very active subforum. Not going to turn down interested actvie members though.
