Because they had like Christensen named at CHF and Pods in a pocket or somehting. I switched that. Wanted to give Blitz a go at 1R
Pods -> CHF Hawkins -> FF tbh And fair enough I guess, was just weird when you said you'd do full strength.
No Walker. Wanted to see what'd happen if Melbourne ran with a shit midfield but good forward/defense so Sylvia/Grimes/Jones didn't touch the midfield all day No tex either.
I have NFI. One of the major flaws in this and it sucks but I don't believe it effects the result. I think it (for some reason) allocates stoppages where there's no discernable hitout to the away team; like when I look deeply the hitout to adv. count isn't much different etc
Things are going to change man. These are trials. You pointing it out makes me want to lower his rating so he does shitter as he should be
Probably will have to. Haven't paid much notice to player ages and I could use a couple good kids considering everyone else has heaps. If Jäger snakes my pick I'll come crawling back though
Fucking Ballantyne. He's done this is heaps of trials I did a few weeks ago too. There's no fucking reason. Tuohy isn't awful. Had everyone set at 50 tightness bar robbo, carrots, deboer and crowley who were at 100 on their opponent. Switched Tuohy to 100 from 50 at 3QT when Ballantyne had 5 Q3 goals. Didn't do anything in the 4th.
7 goals isn't a massive outlier though, it's in the realm of possibility, especially if they're only playing half defence.
