What is it... After having this system for a year it works well for the most part, but obvious fuckups not being overturned makes it look nothing short of ridiculous sometimes. How much evidence is needed to over rule...
Yeah I hate this rule. Balance of probabilities ftw. Referee's opinion should only matter in circumstances where he clearly has a better view than the video referee, which should be exceptionally rare given the latter's ability to access several cameras and have unlimited slow motion replays.
Was pretty obvious he was short, ffs. If they keep this up, there will be a lot of tries scored in this manner this year.
