I rate weeman's team over Mariner's, but that might be due to my taste in racing. Has the winning capaiblity Mariner (aside from Froome and Gerrans) lacks. Admittedly not gonna do much in Tour de France, but should get high in the stage win counts. Slagter is a GC rider/climber. Lightweight Gesink. Butchers the field. And yeah Langeveld is a classics rider. Mariner: Talansky & Kelderman probably better described as 'talents' than domestiques imo.
Thanks. That was generally my plan overall though after my first couple of picks. It's a sport I like but don't know a lot about, which hasn't helped, but I'm sure I'll learn a lot from this.
Yeah hopefully around the giro and all there's a bit of discussion on here and you kinda get even more interested
Cheers. Knew I wasn't really capable of winning much outside of Froome beasting it, quite like a few of my riders as well (don't really know much about the rest :ninja: ). Sprint attack is terrible as well. Weeman/Vimsey's teams my favourite atm.
It's what happens when your team leader is a drugs cheat. Melton Mowbray Pro Cycling's tolerance to performance enhancing drugs is the same as their tolerance for putting sub-standard ingredients into their pork pies. It's fine if nobody catches you
Mark Cavendeesh > All. Other riders that I like in there too. Though tbf, Voigt/Goss are some of my faves as well. EDIT: Heh, what Weeman said too.
Schumacher got busted badly, tbf. Anyone who rides for CWO is probably best avoided. Michael Rasmussen is directeur sportif.
I find your allegation the Andrea Kloden has ever doped to be completely unfounded, because I don't think he'd ever been convicted for it. So there. We'll ignore the fact that the last guy I drafted is a serial doper.
Well done guys on zipping through the draft over the past 5-6 hours. Only a couple of filler spots on the roster remaining.
