Queensland's "answer to Tyson"

Discussion in 'Provincial Competitions' started by Cribbage, Feb 12, 2010.

Page 3 of 5

  1. AVA T Delonge

    Devonshire would be up there, but I think he battede 7 last time in the QLD team.
     
    AVA, Feb 12, 2010
    #41

  2. Skippos SM Morgan

    *Devondire
     
    Skippos, Feb 12, 2010
    #42

  3. AVA T Delonge

    You're a ****ing idiot.
     
    AVA, Feb 12, 2010
    #43

  4. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Yeah he's been averaging 40 consistently with the bat at BS level for the last three seasons and late 30s to high 40s with the ball, so he'd be looking more at batting 6 or 7 and being the fifth bowler than playing as the fourth bowler.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2010
    Cribbage, Feb 12, 2010
    #44

  5. Fiery GR Smith

    Shut up Skippos
     
    Fiery, Feb 12, 2010
    #45

  6. Skippos SM Morgan

    *Devondire bloke
     
    Skippos, Feb 12, 2010
    #46

  7. AVA T Delonge

    He can be 6th bowler. :p
     
    AVA, Feb 12, 2010
    #47

  8. Farhat AM Farhat

    Haha so you need help reading? I've explained it like 10 times. 2 rounds doesn't prove shit.
     
    Farhat, Feb 12, 2010
    #48

  9. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    There are plenty of rounds before origin and Hallett is in great form. I know he won't make the side on 2 good rounds but saying the suggestion of him is stupid is that from someone who didn't think.
     
    Boobidy, Feb 12, 2010
    #49

  10. Farhat AM Farhat

    He took 3 wickets against a Cyclones batting line up which severly unperformed, and came out of Rd 2 with figures of 3/168. Yea, great form. :rolleyes:
    Oh really?

    Fact of the matter is that Orr >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hallet because he has managed to do it for multiple seasons let alone 2 rounds.
     
    Farhat, Feb 12, 2010
    #50

  11. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Maybe your batting lineup underperformed from good bowling.


    Yeah, he won't get picked of 2 rounds form, he will get picked off the 7 or 8 before origin. Unless Ged is picking the team now?



    Hallet has 6wickets @ 37 and 105 runs @ 35.
    Orr has 5 wickets @ 19 and 16 runs @ 9.

    I know who Ged would prefer at 8 when King is at 9.
     
    Boobidy, Feb 12, 2010
    #51

  12. Speirz DG Speirs

    Possibly neither, as I'd imagine Perry could be the second spinner. Otherwise you're left with only the two seamers.
     
    Speirz, Feb 12, 2010
    #52

  13. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Oh yeah and Orr has only got wickets against an underperforming Gamblers side on a crumbling wicket :rollseyes:
     
    Boobidy, Feb 12, 2010
    #53

  14. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Yeah I'm not saying he is a definite or anything like that. But for someone to say that the suggestion of him getting a game is stupid is, well, stupid.
     
    Boobidy, Feb 12, 2010
    #54

  15. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    And I think I've got more chance at being second spinner than Perry. He bowls non stop pies in origin.
     
    Boobidy, Feb 12, 2010
    #55

  16. Farhat AM Farhat

    LooooL there you go using 2 rounds as a sample. Keep digging. I never realised that the Gamblers played in the BS in previous seasons.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2010
    Farhat, Feb 12, 2010
    #56

  17. Farhat AM Farhat

    Could've fooled me.

     
    Farhat, Feb 12, 2010
    #57

  18. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Hallett took 29 wickets @ 25 in season 8. I guess he only has played for 2 games...
     
    Boobidy, Feb 12, 2010
    #58

  19. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Show me where I said he is a definite you ****ing moron. I think he will play, so I said he will.
     
    Boobidy, Feb 12, 2010
    #59

  20. Fiery GR Smith

    Biased excluded...you're losing this argument badly manBoobs
     
    Fiery, Feb 12, 2010
    #60
Page 3 of 5

Share This Page