Code: BULLS 2 1 6 7 13 10 15 10 100 AFLAS 2 2 5 3 8 6 13 12 90 BULLS HO K M H T FF FA G B AFLAS HO K M H T FF FA G B C. Laing 0 3 0 5 1 1 1 0 0 Cox 0 2 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 Tazewell 0 5 2 6 0 1 2 0 0 O'Brien 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 O'Driscoll 0 2 5 14 1 0 0 0 0 Deledio 0 4 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 Downes 0 5 4 3 1 1 5 0 0 Goddard 0 5 5 7 2 1 1 0 0 Burridge 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 Reid 0 11 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 Oz 0 8 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 Scarlett 0 7 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 Jabloami 0 9 6 11 2 3 3 0 0 Montagna 0 8 2 6 2 2 1 0 0 Masters 0 11 6 11 2 2 3 3 0 Murphy 0 14 4 7 1 3 2 0 0 Storer 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 Pendlebury 0 12 2 12 4 0 3 0 1 Manera 0 7 4 5 0 0 2 1 4 Swan 0 5 3 7 1 0 0 1 0 Harding 0 5 6 6 1 0 3 1 1 Birchall 0 5 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 Payne 0 3 4 9 1 0 1 2 0 Chapman 0 9 3 5 2 4 4 2 1 T. Miokovi 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 Sylvia 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 Tyson 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 Franklin 0 5 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 N. Miokovi 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Ablett 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 N. Hunt 16 10 0 11 1 1 0 1 0 Goldstein 12 12 0 6 4 7 0 3 0 Alessi 0 6 0 10 4 6 1 0 2 Selwood 0 7 0 5 6 5 0 0 1 Son 0 15 0 2 4 3 2 1 0 Judd 0 11 0 5 10 2 1 0 1 Tumbleweed 0 16 7 8 1 0 2 1 0 Rioli 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 S. Laing 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Cloke 0 4 3 6 0 1 1 0 1
Neither having much reason to brag, C. Laing had the better of Ablett. - 5m from 94 to 99. While not all all one-way, Alessi came out tops over the brave Selwood. - 93m from 5 to 98. Spending most of the game pushing and shoving each other, Birchall and Burridge were well-matched - there was no victor. - 45m from 53 to 98. Neither having much reason to brag, T. Miokovic had the better of Birchall. - 17m from 27 to 44. Neither having much reason to brag, Cox and Burridge were evenly matched. - 24m from 8 to 32. While overall a quiet day for both players, C. Laing gave Rioli a bath. - 78m from 13 to 91. While overall a quiet day for both players, Chapman exposed Downes's frailties. - 94m from 2 to 96. While overall a quiet day for both players, Cloke did well against Storer. - 46m from 1 to 47. Despite neither player having much impact, T. Miokovic won the bout with Cloke. - 3m from 58 to 61. Neither having much reason to brag, Cox had the better of N. Miokovic. - 21m from 42 to 63. Neither having much reason to brag, Deledio massacred Manera. - 20m from 3 to 23. While overall a quiet day for both players, T. Miokovic gave Deledio a lesson. - 10m from 64 to 74. While worlds were set on fire, Tazewell was way too good for Franklin. - 86m from 13 to 99. In an epic battle, Payne and Goddard were hard to separate - though Payne was slightly more effective. - 81m from 3 to 84. While not all all one-way, Goldstein came out tops over the brave N. Hunt. - 100m from 0 to 100. In quite a tussle, Harding had the better of Reid. - 81m from 4 to 85. In an epic battle, it could be argued that Jabloami had the better game against Pendlebury - although there was very little in it. - 100m from 0 to 100. While not all all one-way, Judd did very well against Son. - 97m from 1 to 98. While both players struggled to make an impact, Scarlett came out tops over the brave Manera. - 59m from 26 to 85. In an enthralling contest, Masters did very well against Murphy. - 100m from 0 to 100. In an enthralling contest, Tumbleweed was slightly more polished than Montagna. - 95m from 3 to 98. While very slim pickings for both players, O'Brien came out tops over the brave Tyson. - 64m from 9 to 73. In quite a tussle, O'Driscoll had the better of Sylvia. - 83m from 14 to 97. Toe to toe throughout, Oz beat Swan today - but not by much. - 98m from 1 to 99. Neither having much reason to brag, S. Laing had the better of Rioli. - 0m from 30 to 30.
For Heath Code: C. Laing | 0 (On) | 20.25 (Off) | 31.26 (On) | Total : 89.09901% N. Miokovic | 0 (On) | 2.17 (Off) | 39.43 (On) | Total : 63.10891% O'Driscoll | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Downes | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Storer | 0 (On) | 51.57 (Off) | 99 (On) | Total : 53.0396% Oz | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Jabloami | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Masters | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Tumbleweed | 0 (On) | 99 (Off) | Total : 99.0099% Manera | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Harding | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Payne | 0 (On) | Total : 100% T. Miokovic | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Tyson | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Burridge | 0 (On) | 39.43 (Off) | 51.57 (On) | Total : 87.9802% N. Hunt | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Alessi | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Son | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Tazewell | 0 (Off) | 2.17 (On) | Total : 96.86139% S. Laing | 0 (Off) | 20.25 (On) | 31.26 (Off) | Total : 10.90099% O'Brien | 0 (On) | 1.07 (Off) | 3.23 (On) | Total : 97.86139% Scarlett | 0 (On) | 3.23 (Off) | 23.43 (On) | Total : 80% Birchall | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Goddard | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Reid | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Deledio | 0 (On) | 23.43 (Off) | 62.31 (On) | Total : 61.50495% Montagna | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Murphy | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Pendlebury | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Swan | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Cloke | 0 (On) | 62.31 (Off) | Total : 62.68317% Chapman | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Sylvia | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Franklin | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Rioli | 0 (On) | 92.49 (Off) | Total : 92.56435% Goldstein | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Selwood | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Judd | 0 (On) | Total : 100% Ablett | 0 (Off) | 92.49 (On) | Total : 7.435646% Cox | 0 (Off) | 1.07 (On) | Total : 97.95049% Total : 3600 Average : 90
