Hey Skippos. You do realise that using the term "ad hominem" or anything else "ad-[]" just reinforces the general opinion regarding you being pseudo-intelligent?
In other words I'm expected to speak using 'silly' words that don't 'fit' so I look 'normal?' I'm allowed to speak how I want. I don't go the whole MF route and go out of my way to use heaps of big words or unusual phrases but if there's something there to be said I'll say it without dumbing it down. I think I had a point anyway. I thought I was having a pretty general discussion and backing it up with facts and then your 'sader buddy brings insults into it? why? surely you who seem to have some semblance of intelligence would realise it was not me who was in the wrong... so why get on the attack? Yet again it does seem that most saders seem to group together irrelevant of the point. admirable yet frustrating but it seems you're learning. Regarding the 'pseudo-intelligent' point: I couldn't care less how I'm seen or how people perceive me, correct or not (I won't be drawn on it for I don't feel it's even relevant. I don't proclaim to be overly intelligent so I don't know why you need to raise it) All of this, triggered by me using a semi-common phrase in it's correct context, coming from the person who said this - an incredible example of comprehension of 'semi-common' terms
Haha, this has nothing to do with him being a Sader, nor does it have anything to do with the actual argument at hand. All I'm saying is that it really looks like you're trying too hard. I wasn't having a go at you, I'm trying to help you actually. And ftr there is nothing wrong with the quoted sentence.
What you don't actually realise (and I'm fully expecting you to use this to back up your argument) is that before I post and write things down here, I actually stop, think, and edit things so that I don't use too many large words or complex structures. Maybe in doing so (for I will admit, my writing on here isn't my natural style) it looks like i'm 'trying hard' - for I am, but for the exact opposite of what you claim my intent is. And I'll continue posting how I want to. Thanks for the advice, but I'd rather not listen to it from a 16(or 17?) year old who really doesn't have much life experience. Even less than I. Of course, I'm forgetting you're an absolute bigshot here and it totally is your place to command people around. Nice one, buddy. Am not going to engage in this any more.
Pumas to dominate both BS and ALC. Vipers won't be too far behind. I'm predicting myself to crack the top 50 bowlers.
Reckon you stand a very good chance at the batsman side of things. You are only one of as things stand anyway. Can potentially see Riddy claiming the bowler side of things.