done exactly what he should've done, good on spencer, they should bring him back another time i think if possible, lol@woo interesting to see a blood vs water 2, hope the cast is good. also no more $100000 for player of the season?
yeah they lost their sponsor for it. yeah spencer deffo won it for tony, tony did deserve it thnough disappointed with a 2nd blood vs water though, this season proved that all new players is the way to go
Fuck the jury members from the beauty tribe were pissing me off. Sore losers like that are the reason the best players like Russell don't win. Thankfully Spencer saved the day. Woo didn't deserve it purely from that retarded last decision. Anyway really enjoyed this. One of the best seasons in a long time
pretty sure its blood vs water but with an all new cast like 2 brothers that have never played the game for example?
Don't think Spencer won it for Tony. He won 8-1, doubt that Spencer seriously influenced that many people. How you can say this is bizarre. He's not even close to being a worst of all time contender. He made it to the final 2 which is a fucking great achievement, and he was only one wrong move away from a million dollars. He also was in deep shit after the 1st merge when his alliance got voted out by Tony/Trish and he swung himself back into the game perfectly.
He did absolutely fucking nothing in the game, he didn't get himself to the final two. He had to ride the back of the Tony-Trish alliance, and only by the grace of Spencer still being there was kept over Trish. His only moment of glory in the entire game was winning final immunity (which he still had to follow Tony for 75% of the maze). But he threw it away by making the worst decision in Survivor history (joining Colby*) over the weakest reasoning possible. He knew if he wanted to win he needed to take Kass, but took Tony anyway. You get to make that decision and willingly choose wrong, you deserve the WOAT banner. * - At least Colby was a beast at challenges.
Nup. You're judging a player's ability on a set of pre-defined rules and regulations that you've set out for the game, it has nothing to do with that. "He didn't get himself to the final two." Yes he fucking did. By choosing who he aligned with throughout the game he made it to the final two, whether or not he was a challenge beast or a tactical mastermind like you seem to think they have to be. He was one step away from winning the game so for you to call him the worst of all time is honestly retarded and you're definitely ignoring huge social portions of the game. If you want some genuine worst of all time contenders, how about you look at Zane from Phillipines or Wendy from Nicaragua. These are people so socially or physically inept they didn't even come close to hearing about a merge, let alone making the final two.
Woo's social game was fucking horrible and I have no idea how anyone could see it otherwise. Spencer and Kass both mention in the reward they have with him that seeing him entertain the kids was the first time they saw the "real" Woo. That was the third to last episode. Nothing we saw showed Woo as having a competent social game. He looked like the game passed him by multiple times and he was just along for the ride.
yeah he was kind of like Fabio who many consider (not myself though) to be one of the worst winners of all time
any ideas as to what they'll do for 30th season? reckon it'll be like a heroes vs villains 2 or some shit?
You are confusing a social game with a tactical game. Saying the game passed him by has nothing to do with his social game. He was mostly fairly well-liked and tolerated by all and his social game was clearly superior to Kass (as the jury agreed on the reunion), J'Tia and Lindsey from this season alone (and you could definitely argue that he had a better social game than most of the other contestants as well). Tactically he offered nothing - I agree, but physically and socially he was very respectable. On most accounts you need to have all 3 to win Survivor (physical, tactical, social) and I think it was only tactical where he was lacking. If he had the tactical nous of Boston Rob or Kim from a few seasons ago then I honestly think he would have dominated this season. And ffs show some perspective. I don't have a problem if you want to call him the worst second-place getter of all time but for you to literally think he's the worst contestant of all time is ridiculous. I'd honestly say he would be ahead of about 50+ people at least in terms of chance % of making to the finals.
yeah i'm sure it'll be some big returning player game. but yeah i know a lot of my favourite players who i'd like to see but a tonne of them were on heroes v villains etc. but i reckon someone like malcolm, spencer and stuff on heroes maybe tony on villains or something?
Shit that is crazy, how did he die he wouldn't have even been 30? Also heard that the next season 2 people had to pull out right before filming and weren't replaced so there is only 18 contestants.