Being 100% serious, I'd have Edwards above Fasolo, and Menzel just higher than both. Something like 75, 76, 77/78. Using Skip's rating proper measurement, not my retarded one.
3 geelong lists, 4 collingwood lists received 3 people out of 4 rated fas 75. MP rated him 95 or s/t I rated Menzel 74, You rated him 78, another dude rated him 75 so he ended up on 76. I think that's fair. he's coming off two ACLs so we haven't seen him for ages and I doubt he was better in his debut season than Fas now. He'll obviously improve with time in this DB though if you're to be believed about his talent.
d'd. Mightypies AVERAGE OF BEST 22: 87 AVERAGE OF TOP 7: 92 AVERAGE OF 8-15: 87 AVERAGE OF 16-24: 81 AVERAGE OF 25-34: 77 Essentially by my ratings the backend of collingwood's 22 (lynch, toovey, johnson, didak, maxwell, fasolo, young, clarke) were better than Fremantle & Adelaide's full 22 on average. The 25-34th blokes were about equal to Melbournes full 22.
Not a waste. All I was interested in was the relative difference between players. i.e. fasolo being 3% ahead of elliot is more important than whether fasolo is rated 30 or 90.