Gamblers CC (AKA The Pay Out Benny Thread)

Discussion in 'CricSim Cricket' started by Boobidy, May 26, 2009.

Page 36 of 38

  1. Benny BS Read

    Because at least 3 of them will be playing in firsts.

    Davis
    Armstrong
    Manera

    Meister may open and push them all down one as well.

    Gives me options.
     
    Benny, Oct 19, 2009
    #701

  2. Wilson SB Wilson

    Meisters not signed yet.
     
    Wilson, Oct 19, 2009
    #702

  3. Benny BS Read

    He will be.
     
    Benny, Oct 19, 2009
    #703

  4. Wilson SB Wilson

    We'll see.
     
    Wilson, Oct 19, 2009
    #704

  5. Skippos SM Morgan

    Morgans an opener too, just is played at 3-6
     
    Skippos, Oct 19, 2009
    #705

  6. Speirz DG Speirs

    Because he's Benny. He signs anyone for his seconds side and if they turn out half-decent he claims it as his brilliant development.
     
    Speirz, Oct 19, 2009
    #706

  7. Benny BS Read

    This isn't the pay out benny thread ****s.
     
    Benny, Oct 19, 2009
    #707

  8. Bedsey JB Dempsey

    Should take lessons from me. :ninja:
     
    Bedsey, Oct 19, 2009
    #708

  9. Benny BS Read

    You're all ****s.
     
    Benny, Oct 19, 2009
    #709

  10. Ged GEC King

    QFT.
     
    Ged, Oct 19, 2009
    #710

  11. Incey BC Jacobs

    Look at all the burners!
     
    Incey, Oct 19, 2009
    #711

  12. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Benny is such a homo.
     
    Boobidy, Oct 19, 2009
    #712

  13. Toolman TR Man

    Hahahahahaha ohhhh I love it.
     
    Toolman, Oct 19, 2009
    #713

  14. Reece3d R Fisher


    I think that might be me. But not the decent development bit lol
     
    Reece3d, Oct 20, 2009
    #714

  15. morgieb MC Burridge

    Probable lineup now....
    1. DR Armstrong
    2. D Davis
    3. BJT Manera
    4. BJ Gemmell
    5. SM Morgan/MC Burridge
    6. AJ O'Driscoll
    7. BS Read/L Popovic
    8. BJ Taylor
    9. SJ Surkelton
    10. DA Crowley
    11. N Spinks

    Whitlist it won't dominate, it isn't wooden spoon material either. Our top 4 is the best in the competition, whereas our bowling attack, while not dominant, isn't rank either.

    Tyson, Hayes & Man leaving has ****ed us over. While Tyson & Hayes leaving were fair enough - given they were both helping the clubs which they started at and gained their reputations at.....Choco signing with the Pumas was weird. We don't have a strike bowler - they do, even without Choco.
     
    morgieb, Oct 23, 2009
    #715

  16. AVA T Delonge

    Pumas >>>>> Gamblers though. Not that weird.
     
    AVA, Oct 23, 2009
    #716

  17. morgieb MC Burridge

    IIRC, he agreed to terms with us and wasn't part of the Saders recruitment drive, for obvious reasons. Only happened a week ago, too.
     
    morgieb, Oct 23, 2009
    #717

  18. AVA T Delonge

    What do Saders have to do with anything? Man was on and off in regards to the
    Pumas as well I do believe.
     
    AVA, Oct 23, 2009
    #718

  19. morgieb MC Burridge

    Yeah, he was.

    Spewing that Weaver, Eggman dogged us - we could have some good players rather than recruiting ****s like Spinksy.
     
    morgieb, Oct 23, 2009
    #719

  20. Eds E Ames

    Weaver was pretty much always going to the 'Rays IIRC.
     
    Eds, Oct 23, 2009
    #720
Page 36 of 38

Share This Page