Sharks vs Roosters *Spoilers*

Discussion in 'The Cesspit: Rugby League Discussion' started by RyanG, May 2, 2009.

Page 1 of 2

  1. RyanG R Gee

    FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
    RyanG, May 2, 2009
    #1

  2. Alec AD Funkotron

    Hmm Blake Green and Brett Seymour versus Mitchell Pearce and Braith Anasta.

    Freakishly even match up.
     
    Alec, May 2, 2009
    #2

  3. Magic AJ Parker

    Some might call it justice.
     
    Magic, May 2, 2009
    #3

  4. Lukic L Popovic

    Battle for NSW halves pairing.
     
    Lukic, May 2, 2009
    #4

  5. Old Mate M Perry

    LOL!
     
    Old Mate, May 2, 2009
    #5

  6. Julian BJ Taylor

    Well seriously, what other options are there?

    You could always play Hughes at half and Seymour five-eighth. Now that I have actually said that, i think it is probably the best option.
     
    Julian, May 2, 2009
    #6

  7. Wilson SB Wilson

    Oh ****ing lol.
     
    Wilson, May 2, 2009
    #7

  8. Farhat AM Farhat

    Trent Barret is playing.
     
    Farhat, May 2, 2009
    #8

  9. Hutchi AW George

    Hoping the Sharks can get a win on the board for once.
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2009
    Hutchi, May 2, 2009
    #9

  10. Wilson SB Wilson

    Whats the starting lineup? It seems really different and I didnt see the lineup on fox.
     
    Wilson, May 2, 2009
    #10

  11. Paddy P Orr

    Tipped a Sharks win, hope they dont let down.
     
    Paddy, May 2, 2009
    #11

  12. Flack SA Flack

    Massive Lol @ That Mitch Brown effort.
     
    Flack, May 2, 2009
    #12

  13. Flack SA Flack

    Even bigger lol @ That intercept, god the Sharks are hopeless.
     
    Flack, May 2, 2009
    #13

  14. Wilson SB Wilson

    Who is number 25?
     
    Wilson, May 2, 2009
    #14

  15. Flack SA Flack

    ****ing lol @ The Roosters bombing a try.
     
    Flack, May 2, 2009
    #15

  16. Julian BJ Taylor

    Is Bronx playing?
     
    Julian, May 2, 2009
    #16

  17. Farhat AM Farhat

    I don't get how that was no try play the ball, and not a double movement?
     
    Farhat, May 2, 2009
    #17

  18. AVA T Delonge

    Agreed. A play the ball means that they are saying he didn't get the ball down, which is just stupid.
     
    AVA, May 2, 2009
    #18

  19. Flack SA Flack

    I don't think you can be got for a double movement over the line, has to be an effort that gets you into the ingoal.
     
    Flack, May 2, 2009
    #19

  20. Flack SA Flack

    That no try for obstruction is a joke, it was a bad read by the defence who was looking to take the decoy... It's the whole ****ing point of decoy runners ffs.
     
    Flack, May 2, 2009
    #20
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page