Stricter Moderation in Serious Threads

Discussion in 'Forum Discussion' started by Cribbage, Feb 12, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 7 of 7

  1. Jimmy J Read

    been infracted twice in almost 4 and half years.
     
    Jimmy, Feb 16, 2012
    #121

  2. AVA T Delonge

    ^^^^

    Enough.
     
    AVA, Feb 16, 2012
    #122

  3. Shri G Shriram

    himym being one?:p
     
    Shri, Feb 16, 2012
    #123

  4. Mousey AJ Son

    I'm smelling a ban soon.
     
    Mousey, Feb 16, 2012
    #124

  5. Jimmy J Read

    :laugh: nah.

    i was asking cribb when simmage was and shit.
     
    Jimmy, Feb 16, 2012
    #125

  6. azzal AJ O'Neill

    Shhhh did you hear what the enforcer just said?? Shhhh
     
    azzal, Feb 16, 2012
    #126

  7. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    Imma fly in the face of the Admins (potentially becoming the object of there eire), and say that surely the subject matter of this entire thread is the system of moderation and therefore talking about the relative ease (difficulty) of recieving infractions (and subsequently bans) is in fact the only acceptable (or at least topically relevant) material for posting. It seems rather ridiculous to outlaw that conversation (obviously talking about specific instances is a different matter). If it were not meant for disscussion it should have been made as an anouncement rather then a thread?

    Basically AVA I am calling you out!
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2012
    stupersteve03, Feb 16, 2012
    #127

  8. Mousey AJ Son

    Don't talk about/complain about your infractions though.

    EDIT: Or suggest the admin team has an agenda.
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2012
    Mousey, Feb 16, 2012
    #128

  9. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    As far as I can tell this is not what is happening though. Apart from some erant fiery posting (what else do we expect) I think most people have been talking about the process rather topically, and in fact a majority of people who wieghed in on the agenda buisness have fallen down in the admins favour...
     
    stupersteve03, Feb 16, 2012
    #129

  10. Mousey AJ Son

    Then they'll be fine.
     
    Mousey, Feb 16, 2012
    #130

  11. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    So you say... but this was threatened with action, I can not see how it is anyway in violation?

    There is not speific mention of the reason for the infractions it was merely a statement (in theme with this thread) how avoiding infractions is easy. Surely this is the correct subject material for this thread.

    And perhaps my questioning of the admining process is on the other hand infractionable, certainly I feel I am flying a whole lot closer to the sun then Jimmy was...
     
    stupersteve03, Feb 16, 2012
    #131

  12. Bedsey JB Dempsey

    That was AVA, lol. He doesn't count.
     
    Bedsey, Feb 16, 2012
    #132

  13. Mousey AJ Son

    I only said I smell a ban coming because the subsequent posts could go down as defying admin instructions. That post of Jimmy's you quoted I certainly wouldn't infract, and no-one did :p

    I think AVA was just stopping a potential fire before it started.
     
    Mousey, Feb 16, 2012
    #133

  14. AVA T Delonge

    Yeah this.

    Discussing the amount of infractions you've gotten isn't what this thread was made for. And in fact discussing infractions you've received at all is frowned upon by the admin team. I was just stopping it before it lead to infractable posting.
     
    AVA, Feb 16, 2012
    #134

  15. crowley DA Crowley

    What if you've never received any, like myself. Are you allowed to boast. :)
     
    crowley, Feb 17, 2012
    #135

  16. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Fiery, if you think the admins here have an agenda, you're free to stop posting here. If you can't tell the difference between a serious thread and a rubbish thread where anything goes, you're an idiot, in which case you're also free to stop posting here.

    And if you don't cease your own agenda about the admins, you'll be ONLY free to stop posting here because you'll be banned. This is not just about this thread but in fact every thread. You are not to post about admin matters anymore. Do not go and have a whinge about this post in the Vipers forum. Do not message me on Facebook. Do not bring it up again next time you feel it's relevant. Leave the adminning to the admins. Remember when you were caged in the Vipers forum and begged constantly to be let out, saying you'd be good and not cause trouble etc? Well irrespective of the fact that it was clearly bullshit, picking a fight with the admins who decided to let you out (it was supposed to be permanent) is not only a bit of a slap in the face but also something you can ever really 'win', so pick another target. Stop it, or you're gone. Forever. And ever.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2012
    Cribbage, Feb 17, 2012
    #136

  17. Cribbage RG Cribb

    I think AVA's post was about the errant Fiery posting.
     
    Cribbage, Feb 17, 2012
    #137

  18. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Would also like to add that we have a zero tolerance policy on people who just want to be disobedient cunts for the sake it. I pay a lot of money to keep this place going and none of you have god-given rights to post here; it's a privately owned website.

    If you want to defy the admins by whinging about decisions, reposting deleting threads, replying to infractions etc you won't be welcome to post here. We're more lenient than most sports forums on most things, but this isn't one of those things.

    One thing that has come up is that people like don't like me posting in "their" subforums. Well newsflash - all the subforums here are mine, because I pay for them and maintain them. It's me who lets you post in them, and I may decide not to.
     
    Cribbage, Feb 18, 2012
    #138

  19. HeathDavisSpeed HT Davis

    Really?
     
    HeathDavisSpeed, Feb 18, 2012
    #139
Page 7 of 7
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page