What change other than you to 4 would you have made. Lover's form dictated that we take Devonshire in despite under-performing and Perry's shithouse bowling meant that we needed to take Rolande in. I can see a point with Perry but he's so much better than our next best option, Retzel, that I needed to give him a shot at his preferred position, particularly when he averaged 50 this season while you've been averaging 30 odd, and your one good game came batting at 5.
Give the bowling allrounder at 8 idea the flick at least as a trial would be the first thing. You're obsessed with it Ged.
Gee would be in at 6. He has failed before, but he has had about 15 games less than Perry. Perry should not be picked again, IMO.
Devonshire and Orr fill two completely different roles. Devonshire's in their to bowl first change and for his batting, also. Orr would compete with Hallett for a spot. Hallett performed admirably.
Perry averaged 30 before this series started from 21 games. Gee averages 26.21 from 10 matches. On top of this, Perry actually appeared to be coming good last season with some good knocks. Onwards from all of this, I take it that you now want to promote Webber to number 5?
Righto champ. who the **** do you want to play? The options are Lover to come out of reggies. Rocker, a man with an origin average of 41 with the pill. Surkelton, with an origin average of 37 and averaging 45 this season. On top of this, who are you having bat at 7 if it's not Devonshire. Think out the situation before just coming out with shit. Do you not think that I've thought of this?